GLADIO ERGENEKON Turkey deep state clean-up

    Maras massacre
    Horrible events broke out in Turkey's southern province of
    Kahramanmaras, formerly Maras, 30 years ago. The violent
    incidents started on Dec. 19, 1978 and could only be stopped by
    Dec. 26.

    In these incidents, which came to be referred to as the Maras
    massacre -- forming a major milestone in the run-up to the
    military coup of Sept. 12, 1980, 111 Alevis died and thousands
    were wounded, according to official figures. Given the extent of
    the incidents, one can suggest that the real figures must be much
    higher.

    The Maras massacre has a very special place in Turkish history,
    which is rife with provocations. In fact, the Maras massacre
    shares similar characteristics with many previous provocations.
    The incidents were sparked by the bombing of a movie theater
    frequented by nationalists. As was the case with the Sept. 6-7,
    1955 incidents, it was later found that the bomber was actually a
    nationalist who had ties to the deep state. Again, as seen in the
    incidents of Sept. 6-7, the houses of Alevis were marked ahead of
    the massacre. Two Alevi teachers were killed. The incidents
    started during the funeral ceremony of these teachers. The
    funeral was attacked by a large crowd of nationalists who were
    provoked by rumors that Alevis had burned down mosques and killed
    Sunnis. The ensuing massacre that occurred in Alevi neighborhoods
    was so horrible that it can leave humans at a loss for words.

    Just as it has not confronted or challenged any other massacre,
    Turkey did not confront or challenge the Maras massacre. It was
    not even possible to commemorate the Maras massacre until the
    recent commemoration ceremony held a few days ago in Maras during
    which very thought-provoking incidents happened. I will discuss
    this ceremony in my article on Friday.

    There is not the slightest of doubt about the involvement of the
    Turkish deep state, or the Turkish Gladio, which was the
    precursor to today's Ergenekon, in the Maras incidents of 1978.
    But if we tend to treat such incidents only with respect to their
    political repercussions and put all the blame on the deep state,
    without trying to understand the psychological moods of the
    people who played a role in such massacres, does this take us
    anywhere? Why are people in Turkey so easily manipulated in such
    provocations? Why do we so readily forget these incidents? As I
    will try to explain in the sequel to this article, nothing is
    forgotten, but our failure to confront and discuss such massacres
    only allows the pro-massacre spirit to continue to live in
    Turkey.

    The details of the massacre in Maras cannot be squeezed into this
    article. It would certainly be better if several documentaries be
    shot or novels or textbooks be written about this tragic incident
    so that we never forget about them and that history never repeats
    itself. Novelist Inci Aral has treated the Maras incidents in her
    storybook "Kiran Resimleri" (Pictures of Destruction). Her
    descriptions of how she was able to write those stories amply
    indicate the horrifying effect of the incidents themselves. Let
    us read how Aral decided to write her storybook on the Maras
    massacre (see Orhan Tu:leylioglu, "Maras Katliami"):
    "For three days, the city was truly a battlefield and was on
    fire. ... According to official figures, 111 people were killed
    by shooting, cutting or burning. Shops, houses and people's
    residential sanctuaries were attacked; women were raped; abdomens
    of pregnant women were cut and fetuses were nailed to trees. The
    breasts of young girls were mutilated and placed on sticks and
    put on display. ... Images published by papers and broadcast on
    TV were unbearable for anyone with a human conscience. ... For
    months I could not get rid of those memories and the horror of
    the incidents. ... I had considered going to Kahramanmaras and
    making on-the-spot observations about the incidents, and the
    following words of a friend of mine from Maras reaffirmed my
    intention: `Maras is still a bleeding wound. ... Why don't you
    consider writing about those incidents?'

    "One night, I got on the bus and went to Maras. ... Those who
    survived the incidents had returned to their villages after the
    incidents. The next day, they started to take me from one village
    to another, sometimes with a motorcycle and sometimes on a horse
    carriage -- and sometimes on extremely packed minibuses, for 10
    days. They treated me as their guest in their poor houses. ...
    They incessantly talked about the massacre and violence that
    befell them. Never before had I seen such entrenched poverty,
    helplessness and sincerity. Finding myself in a different world
    and among the people whom I only knew to exist by hearsay was
    touching. There I learned the beauty of the human heart and
    warmth of my people.

    "When I returned to Ankara, I could not speak for a month. I then
    obtained the minutes of hearings [Author's note: She is referring
    to a lawsuit brought in connection with the massacre and which
    proved unproductive] from the joint attorneys and read the
    witness testimonies, which were stuffed into 40 dossiers. As I
    read through the minutes in tears, I came to believe what the
    villagers had told me about the massacre. On that day my migraine
    started.

    "For one year I thought about how to narrate this violence. ... I
    was not a journalist but a writer. I might tell an intense or
    harsh story, but it must fall within the limits of literature and
    be permanent. In the early 1980s I started to work on `Kiran
    Resimleri' with the first story, `Elif.' I was only able to write
    one story per month because I could not get over it any quicker.
    ... I completed the book a year later. ...
    "`Kiran Resimleri' is a bold initiative for me and a watershed of
    my 35 years of authorship. This small book speaks from the
    perspective of a writer how people who had been living together
    for centuries and who had been neighbors and who had intermarried
    could in only a couple of days be turned into enemies who would
    kill each other."

    Now read what Aral wrote, and in particular her last paragraph,
    from the perspective of the 1915 Armenian massacre, the 1934
    Jewish pogroms, the Sept. 6-7, 1955 incidents and many other
    bloody events in Turkey's past. You will see that Turkish history
    repeats itself. And this will continue if we don't confront the
    past.Source URL: http://threemoonsevolving.blogspot.com/2011/01/gladio-ergenekon-turkey-deep-state.html
    Visit Future Design Interior for daily updated images of art collection